Re: Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels
- To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:07:33 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 097947a8-33d2-eb05-2721-019cf881587d@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAKTje6F7jny1mQDy_+6j-W92uK04LghPX_k8u=ZqP4wxT-+_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1490882685.6871.5.camel@debian.org> <1490885772.3457193.928728144.4D47E93F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1490889250.6871.7.camel@debian.org> <CAKTje6F7jny1mQDy_+6j-W92uK04LghPX_k8u=ZqP4wxT-+_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/31/2017 01:26 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
>> Do you think a HW Certification Process should be available for Debian ?
>
> I note that some hardware vendors are asking for one, one example here:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/7CBC77DE593A114587C3D1A3C385EAAFB54CA8@MAILBX03.quanta.corp
Even more, from my experience, the availability of an HCL (ie: Hardware
Compatibility List) is mandatory for some vendors to choose Debian. At
$work, I've been told that Debian wouldn't an option for it.
I had thoughts about this, and the only way I see it happening, is by
having some kind of software comparable to Ubuntu's "Checkbox", with
some report on our website. Then through this process, offer vendors the
possibility to put a "Debian compatible" logo on their website. To avoid
trademark issues, this logo *must* be different from the standard Debian
logo.
Note that I am convince the FSF initiative (I can't remember the ugly
website name, sorry...) is *not* a correct response to this need. We
need our own thing.
If one was to start such initiative, I'd be happy to help.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: