Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:27:02 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20170111212702.nhead6x3woxm5wld@hephaestus.silentflame.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87wpe26meg.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>
References: <[🔎] 20170110020819.h7dyrqxvywotn22r@hephaestus.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 3194402.efPJBb10Cu@kitterma-e6430> <[🔎] 20170110234536.gf7pq3smwvjh4pky@hephaestus.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 87wpe26meg.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>

Hello,

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:17:27AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Also, this is IMO nothing for a foundational document. But some docs
> around it as explanation on how real world handles things.

Do we have such a doc right now?  Possibly somewhere on the wiki I'm
unaware of?

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread