[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

Hello Scott,

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:04:02PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Yes, but all your proposed GR does is move the problem one definition
> to the right.

I don't follow this objection.  The SC is not meant to contain
exhaustive details of policies.  At present, though, I think it goes too
far the other way.  This GR is intended to nudge it closer to the right
level of detail.

> Are you aware of any newcomers that have been negatively affected this
> way?

I'm not.  I could imagine it happening to a younger version of myself,

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: