On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:44:59PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to > > do so are authorized to declassify excerpts of -private of historical > > interest by any process which provides sufficient opportunity for > > Debian Developers to object by GR prior to declassification. > ^^^^^ > > This barrier is too high, IMO. I would prefer it if "by GR" were > removed, so that the listmasters can come up with their own procedure > with whatever objection method they think is appropriate. > > (GRs are, of course, always going to be on the table regardless.) Right, so I'm not sure I understand your objection here. The only process I can imagine that would *not* provide "sufficient opportunity" as proposed by Don, is clicking a button that would immediately make all the archives public, without any warning whatsoever. Any process that is announced even just a few days before being enacted would certainly match my barrier for "sufficient opportunity". So can you maybe clarify your worry here? (I'm asking because I'm potentially interested in sponsoring Don's amendment.) Many thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature