On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase, > you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR. Oh, I think there might be an ambiguity here. I am interpreting Don's text as saying that DDs should be able to object *to the process* via a GR; whereas Nicolas (and possibly Iain) seem to be interpreting it as saying that DDs should be able to object to individual declassification actions via a GR. I agree the latter would be very weird, also because it will potentially result in public votes about private messages that are not disclosed in the call for votes and the like. Can you clarify which is which Don? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature