[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: In plain English please?! Re: General resolution: Changes to the Standard Resolution Procedure



On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:47:47AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
> 
> > The solution to this problem is moving the majority check later
> > in the process, so that option B would have been dropped first.
> > If they did this stratigic voting in that case both options would
> > have been dropped.
> 
> Interesting -- one thought: haven't voting systems been dissected and
> specified in research literature for quite some time?  Isn't there one
> that is already established and analyzed that we can refer to, instead
> of trying to design these (quite complicated) rules for ourselves?  We
> would have to find a voting system that matches Debian's intent, which
> might be a challenge though.

As far as I understand the problem is that none of them have a majority
requirement.


Kurt


Reply to: