[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Q to all candidates: dropping SC §5



On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:37:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There are two possibilities for such a proposal: either we keep running
> contrib/non-free like we do now but just change the domain names, or we
> actually try to eliminate them from the project.  The former is a bunch of
> work (for people outside the project as well as in) for no real benefit.

FWIW, this is precisely what http://www.non-free.org/ is about.

> I'm particularly concerned about keeping Debian a viable distribution for
> enterprise and large-scale server deployments, where, for better or worse,
> a well-integrated way to add non-free firmware is simply mandatory in
> practice right now.

You seem to view dropping SC §5 as something potentially catastrophic
from the technical side, for enterprise and large-scale deployments. But
at the same time you acknowledge changing domain names as a way to go
about it. Surely if we do that change the catastrophe won't happen then?

It'll be just a matter of for how long we can keep the old URLs
working---and the answer can very well be "forever". In which case there
is not even a need of work on the user side. As any undocumented
implemented detail, the amount of deployments using the old URLs will
gradually disappear over time (in infinite time, of course).

> So I'm not sure this is a good DPL question, as the DPL really isn't
> likely to get much of a say about this.

The answers to this question (including those from candidates who didn't
or won't really answer) speak volumes about candidates' views on broad
Free Software philosophy/politics, and where in their opinion Debian
should stand within those spectrum.

I do realize that those topics are not equally interesting for all
voters though.

Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: