Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]

To: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
From: Cameron Stewart <cameron@shptech.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:24:05 +1100
Message-id: <CAEfNLsS5pCEJDvDemKsDhJm_NOUTv_Dh+famX+Knxc3jCjOPdw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CABpYwDX8YdWNssejMr3KQmoGqj84XvsKHai0N5O7Lzqvnw1k6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABpYwDVH=uN5eoe5UTqWQt+E7ukF-+vrZYKz=xc5woL6h09HCw@mail.gmail.com> <20141024101536.GA25272@master.debian.org> <CABpYwDUFzD2WAYyMV_dyPAVoDNxcPpL9V4Vs5L-tU4oMTw3+uw@mail.gmail.com> <20141024133236.GA32521@master.debian.org> <m2n.s.1XinRr-288976@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <21583.53704.27638.307186@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87lhnz5ixv.fsf@hands.com> <21584.56519.503449.998309@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <m2quub$s94$1@posted-at.bofh.it> <20141030084108.GB2570@pax.zz.de> <20141030094302.GC3890@smurf.noris.de> <CABpYwDX8YdWNssejMr3KQmoGqj84XvsKHai0N5O7Lzqvnw1k6g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have other distros switched to _only_ supporting systemd? Changing the
> default is not the same. This is not a rhetorical question - it would
> actually be useful to know if other distros have actually already
> abandoned support for non-systemd init systems.

RHEL/CentOS 7+, Fedora 15+ and Arch Linux have all dropped sysvinit support.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
- Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Florian Lohoff <f@zz.de>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Next by Date: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Previous by thread: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Next by thread: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread