Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:11:51 +0100
Message-id: <201410291611.58883.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <21584.56519.503449.998309@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <21575.42067.727169.68420@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87lhnz5ixv.fsf@hands.com> <21584.56519.503449.998309@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In the battle between those upstreams and Debian contributors [...]

please, don't mention the war.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Next by Date: Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate?
Previous by thread: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments]
Next by thread: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread