Lucas Nussbaum <leader@debian.org> (2014-10-22): > On 17/10/14 at 10:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > But designing and tuning alternative proposals might take time, so I > > would prefer to wait a few days before reducing the discussion period, > > to ensure that we vote with a sensible ballot. I will decide in the > > middle of next week about that. > > I think that the current set of options would be a sensible ballot, and > I'm not aware of any discussions to add another option, so I'm inclined > to shorten the discussion period. For all I know/remember from the mails I read, it seems there was an agreement that this GR wouldn't affect jessie in any way. While I can sympathize with trying to reach a conclusion sooner than later, possibly sparing quite some mails[1], I'm not sure why there would be any need for any "rush". Can't we just let the usual timing apply? 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00319.html KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature