Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On 2014-10-17 12:00, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> On 17 October 2014 13:27, Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> wrote:
> > If it passes (which I consider to be sufficiently unlikely to wonder 
> > why
> > the *censored* Ian even bothered, but whatever), _then_ these lists 
> > are the
> > right places to discuss the implications. Until then, let's keep it 
> > here.
>
> > From the discussion so far (and please correct me if I am wrong) the
> only implication of this passing would be that a failure of
> init-system-neutrality would now be a serious bug.

Note (and this is not splitting hairs) that "serious bug" is not a 
direct analogue for "release-critical bug".

Regards,

Adam