Re: draft alternative proposal: fix problem at the root
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:18:24PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:13:32AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Acting together with themselves? ;-)
> Thank you.
> --- /tmp/constitution.txt.orig 2014-12-02 15:54:42.758894286 -0500
> +++ /tmp/constitution.txt 2014-12-02 18:17:43.180963356 -0500
> @@ -20,10 +20,9 @@
> Each decision in the Project is made by one or more of the following:
> 1. The Developers, by way of General Resolution or an election;
> 2. The Project Leader;
> - 3. The Technical Committee and/or its Chairman;
> - 4. The individual Developer working on a particular task;
> - 5. Delegates appointed by the Project Leader for specific tasks;
> - 6. The Project Secretary.
> + 3. The individual Developer working on a particular task;
> + 4. Delegates appointed by the Project Leader for specific tasks;
> + 5. The Project Secretary.
I am in favor of this option appearing on the ballot. I have been following
the TC for 15 years, and it is clear to me that the cost of having a TC
outweights the benefit (and I had the same opinion 5 years ago).
There are very few developers I would trust on to be on the TC that are not
TC members already, and they are the developers we can the least waste their
time by have them sitting in the TC.
Imagine a large red swirl here.