[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SUMMARY] Maximum term for tech ctte members

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:01:40PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > I can't find the reference right now, but IIRC we've discussed this
> > > during the init system coupling GR and I don't think it's possible: you
> > > are DPL, if you introduce an amendment, it's automatically accepted. I
> > > don't remember if the Secretary acknowledged that interpretation, but
> > > reading of §4.2.1 doesn't seem to leave much room for interpretation.
> > > So you could either ask someone else to propose the amendment, or gather
> > > seconds informally yourself and only propose the amendment when you've
> > > received K of them.
> > 
> > According to <20141017174252.GB10521@roeckx.be>, I think it's possible.
> > But maybe the Secretary can clarify.
> Ah yes, that was the thread I had in mind, thanks. I found follow-ups to
> that message [4,5] to be fairly convincing, but we clearly need an
> answer from the Secretary.

I don't have a strong opinion about it, and it seems that most
people seem to think that the person that is DPL is always
proposing as the DPL.  So I'm going to go with that view.


Reply to: