[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DRAFT] Maximum term for tech ctte members



On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:41:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > "provided /they/ were appointed"
>
> This is still pending, and noted in BUGS. I agree this is as a potential
> problem, at least if you look at it from a paranoid angle. I find your
> suggested wording not immediate, though, and I wonder if a/ someone else
> has better suggestion, and b/ whether this is worth fixing.

Maybe this:

diff --git a/constitution.txt.new b/constitution.txt.new
index 96245cf..fb5ac4a 100644
--- a/constitution.txt.new
+++ b/constitution.txt.new
@@ -305,10 +305,10 @@
        remove or replace an existing member of the Technical Committee.
     7. Term limit:
          1. Membership of the Technical Committee is automatically
-            reviewed on the 1st of January of each year. At this time, the
-            terms of the 2 most senior members automatically expire
-            provided they were appointed at least four and a half years
-            (54 months) ago.
+            reviewed on the 1st of January of each year. At this time,
+            the terms of the 2 most senior members who were most
+            recently appointed at least 54 months ago automatically
+            expire.
          2. A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior
             than another if they were appointed earlier, or were appointed
             at the same time and have been a member of the Debian Project
-- 
2.1.1

Also, one of the things that would also be nice to fix is to make the
max number of CTTE members 9 instead of 8, to avoid the casting vote
problem when the CTTE is full.

I don't believe that we should force the CTTE to have an odd number,
because that is complicated, and may not be worth the effort, either.

This patch is simple, but:

diff --git a/constitution.txt.new b/constitution.txt.new
index 96245cf..85f0043 100644
--- a/constitution.txt.new
+++ b/constitution.txt.new
@@ -288,9 +288,9 @@
 
   6.2. Composition
 
-    1. The Technical Committee consists of up to 8 Developers, and should
+    1. The Technical Committee consists of up to 9 Developers, and should
        usually have at least 4 members.
-    2. When there are fewer than 8 members the Technical Committee may
+    2. When there are fewer than 9 members the Technical Committee may
        recommend new member(s) to the Project Leader, who may choose
        (individually) to appoint them or not.
     3. When there are 5 members or fewer the Technical Committee may
-- 
2.1.1

But if this is at all controversial, then we can put this forward later.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with
autodestructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to
the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their
own. 
 -- The HipCrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan 
    (John Brunner _Stand On Zanzibar_ p256-7)


Reply to: