[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement.

Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our
> Contitution.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
> General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the
> outcome of the vote.
> Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the
> procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working
> adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't suppose it's necessary, but since that perfectly fits my
thoughts on this subject:


Thank you for your efforts on this, and especially for this improved wording.

Cheers, Phil.
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: pgpG2V6jfanYs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: