[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members

Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:34:28AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> I think rotation is a good idea. My main minor concern is that it
>> doesn't allow reappointing members to the CTTE if there are no
>> nominees whom the DPL and CTTE finds acceptable (or even if there are no
>> nominees at all).
> In that event the ctte would have 6 people rather than 8 for 12 months,
> at which point the two expirees could be reappointed. (Though another
> 2 might expire then, keeping it at 6 members)

While not fatal, that doesn't seem particularly desirable.

> I don't think there's a shortage of potential candidates
> in Debian, so on that score I don't think it's likely there won't be
> sufficient acceptable nominees. 

I agree.


Attachment: pgpaZmmA3Y9sS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: