Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
On Fri, October 17, 2014 19:42, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal
>> Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current
>> Project Leader, and thus does not require seconds, but will record those
>> seconding anyway.
> I don't see him doing it with his DPL hat on, so Lucas can you
> clarify that you do this as DPL or not? (But there seem to be
> enough seconds, so it doesn't seem to matter.)
Does the constituion has a concept of hats? You're either the DPL or
you're not. It seems Lucas is the DPL. If Lucas proposes an amendment, the
DPL has proposed an amendment, right?