[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#636783: supermajority bug

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

> Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#636783: supermajority bug"):
> > Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> > > The fix to the constitutional supermajority bug has been delayed
> > > rather.  Sorry about that.  I have drafted what I think is an
> > > implementation of our conclusions here and in the TC.
> > 
> > > Opinions welcome.
> > 
> > I haven't reviewed the wording in detail, but the general discussion and
> > intent looks right to me.  Thank you for drafting this!
> You're welcome.
> I'd appreciate it if _someone_ would review the wording in detail, and
> post to say that they'd done so.  (That doesn't have to be a TC
> member, of course.)  It would be embarassing to have to fix this
> _again_ ...

Do you have a version of the voting-text-as-amended if this were to
pass, IYSWIM? I think that would be easier to review than putting
together current-text plus diff.



"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."

Reply to: