Re: Bug#636783: supermajority bug
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#636783: supermajority bug"):
> > Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > The fix to the constitutional supermajority bug has been delayed
> > > rather. Sorry about that. I have drafted what I think is an
> > > implementation of our conclusions here and in the TC.
> > > Opinions welcome.
> > I haven't reviewed the wording in detail, but the general discussion and
> > intent looks right to me. Thank you for drafting this!
> You're welcome.
> I'd appreciate it if _someone_ would review the wording in detail, and
> post to say that they'd done so. (That doesn't have to be a TC
> member, of course.) It would be embarassing to have to fix this
> _again_ ...
Do you have a version of the voting-text-as-amended if this were to
pass, IYSWIM? I think that would be easier to review than putting
together current-text plus diff.
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."