[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#636783: supermajority bug

Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#636783: supermajority bug"):
> Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> > The fix to the constitutional supermajority bug has been delayed
> > rather.  Sorry about that.  I have drafted what I think is an
> > implementation of our conclusions here and in the TC.
> > Opinions welcome.
> I haven't reviewed the wording in detail, but the general discussion and
> intent looks right to me.  Thank you for drafting this!

You're welcome.

I'd appreciate it if _someone_ would review the wording in detail, and
post to say that they'd done so.  (That doesn't have to be a TC
member, of course.)  It would be embarassing to have to fix this
_again_ ...


Reply to: