Re: Rationale for CoC proposal A
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:45:10AM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> What if the DPL begins to consider persistent disagreement with the
> DPL as a form of "flaming"?
We can then override the DPL's decision, or recall the DPL.
Also, there is a second option on the ballot. You don't have to agree with
> ----- "Wouter Verhelst" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a rationale for option one on the ballot, if I
> > may:
> > Rationale:
> > Allowing the DPL to update the Code of Conduct will make it easier
> > to
> > adapt it to changing circumstances, without having to go through a
> > lengthy GR procedure. One of the roles of the DPL is to mediate in
> > case of conflict; therefore, the DPL is in an ideal position to
> > detect
> > when an update to the code of conduct may be necessary.
> > If the DPL were to go rogue and replace the Code of Conduct by a
> > blank
> > page (or similar), we already have sufficient procedures to recall
> > or
> > override the DPL.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
> Archive: 16041386.67041395560710985.JavaMail.firstname.lastname@example.org">https://lists.debian.org/16041386.67041395560710985.JavaMail.email@example.com
This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you
will not go to space today.