[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Both DPL candidates: handling social conflict

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:10:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:44:54PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
While I understand the question, I'm not sure this is very relevant.

Yes, Debian is about promoting the cause of free software; and yes,
actually *using* free software is a very good (first) way to promote
its cause.

I'll encourage everyone interested in these topics to read this, very
influential for me, essay by Mako:

 Free Software Needs Free Tools

Also, +1 to Paul's mail. The DPL is a rather special case. I certainly
don't fancy Debian being slashdotted due to the DPL using non-free
software publicly, at the very least as long as suitable Free
alternatives exist.


to Paul and Zack.

Did we not *eagerly* endure, fifteen years ago, highly unstable
software (October GNOME, anyone ?) because we thought that by using it
we were going to unavoidably better it, for the cause of software
Nowadays Free Software has become so usable, Neil must have an
explanation for not using it to post messages. Let him tell us maybe
that he had to borrow a computer... He will certainly have a story to


Filippo Rusconi, PhD - public crypto key C78F687C @ pgp.mit.edu
Researcher at CNRS and Debian Developer <lopippo@debian.org>
Author of ``massXpert''     at http://www.massxpert.org

Reply to: