Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:28:00AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
> On 8 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Wouter Verhelst <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:05:45PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >> Amendment A - move mailing list CoC text to "further reading"
> > After some consideration, I accept this amendment.
> Thank you very much :)
> >> Amendment B - Updates to the CoC should be via developers as a whole
> > So rather than accepting this amendment, I propose that we modify
> > paragraph 3 read as follows, instead:
> > -------
> > 3. Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR
> > procedure. However, the DPL or the DPL's delegates can add or
> > remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section
> > after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR.
> > -------
> > The idea here is that a DPL can add a link to something considered
> > useful, while "normal" DD's can still add such a link through a GR if
> > the DPL is opposed.
> > How's that sound?
> That sounds very sensible to me, I'd be happy to accept it. I'm not sure what formal process Kurt would like me to follow to get these incorporated - Kurt?
I think it should follow the normal rules of accepting amendements
and that if a sponsor doesn't agree he should speak up.