Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
On 8 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:05:45PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> Amendment A - move mailing list CoC text to "further reading"
> After some consideration, I accept this amendment.
Thank you very much :)
>> Amendment B - Updates to the CoC should be via developers as a whole
> So rather than accepting this amendment, I propose that we modify
> paragraph 3 read as follows, instead:
> 3. Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR
> procedure. However, the DPL or the DPL's delegates can add or
> remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section
> after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR.
> The idea here is that a DPL can add a link to something considered
> useful, while "normal" DD's can still add such a link through a GR if
> the DPL is opposed.
> How's that sound?
That sounds very sensible to me, I’d be happy to accept it. I’m not sure what formal process Kurt would like me to follow to get these incorporated - Kurt?