Re: Debian for third party (read: propietary) apps/vendors
Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I agree with this. This is why I proposed a while back to look into
> clarifying which parts of policy really only apply to "packages uploaded
> to Debian", as opposed to "packages for local use", which may have
> different requirements in some cases.
> There wasn't any response to that mail, however, which lead me to think
> there wasn't much interest in that proposal.
For the record, I'm extremely interested in doing this, but it's a lot of
work and I have approximately zero time right now to work on Policy
things, so I can't (at the moment) help. I probably should have said all
of that instead of not saying anything; sorry!
It strikes me as something that's best done as part of the long-delayed
larger restructuring that we've wanted to do when changing formats.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>