Re: Question for Stefano
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> So, Stefano,
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:29:38AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > shouldn't need another candidate get in the way. After all, we've seen
> > excellent candidates burn out in their second year in the past, and so
> > far Stefano has not given us any reason why he wouldn't burn out
> > (you may consider that my first question if you wish, Stefano).
>
> Since I didn't make that a very explicit question, let me do so now:
> We've had several DPL's in the past who've done more than one term, but
> (IMHO) we've never had DPL's who've not started getting less active or
> less publically visible towards the end of their second term; this was
> the case for, at least, Martin Michlmayr, but also for your immediate
> predecessor, Steve McIntyre.
>
> How do you propose to prevent that from happening to you?
>
> (note that I think this whole vote is moot anyway -- if Stefano wins,
> Stefano is DPL. If Stefano doesn't win, and None of the Above wins,
> Stefano will remain DPL until we have another vote...
another election, not another vote. Which means there could be more
candidates.
Mike
Reply to: