Hi, On Freitag, 11. März 2011, Joachim Breitner wrote: > A mudslinging party is not something to aim for. Right. > But if it turns out > that there are differing views on important project-wide issues within > Debian, and there are candidates for each side of some discussion, then > having an intense debate over these issue within the rituals of the > campaigning, summarized by platforms and rebuttals, for those not > following d-vote, and ended by a project-wide election seems to be > better than some endless discussions between few people on d-devel or > d-project. > > If we want to keep Debian known as one of the most democratic Free > Software projects, then we should not discourage a lively debate, when > there is need for it. Absolutly. But I also absolutly dont see, why this has to turn into a mudslinging party. One can disagree very much and very fiercly, without "mudslinging". At least thats what I expect from people running for DPL. "We argue with passion, so we punch each other in the stomach" doesnt make any sense to me. cheers, Holger .oO( "war is just a more lively discussion". no. )
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.