Re: Naming of non-uploading DDs
Joerg Jaspert <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The more important part is getting the project to acknowledge the
> concept of a set of members/developers/whateveryounameit not having
> upload rights by default and letting DAM/FD/theusualpeople just manage
> that. The important part is opening our membership to people who deserve
> it, but who (most likely) never ever will maintain a package and as such
> currently have a hard time joiningm as we do want to see new people have
> at least a basic set of knowledge packaging requires (be that using a
> set of questions or by evaluating what they have in the archive, the
> procedure there is up to the AM). And the latter part should change,
> giving people who want to an early exit - consequently a little less
> ability later on, but one they dont need/want then.
This I definitely agree with and support.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>