Jakub Wilk <email@example.com> writes: > * Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org>, 2010-09-14, 18:56: >>[B] Give everybody upload rights anyway. If we trust them to influence >>the project's decisions through voting, we should probably trust them to >>do the right thing and not upload packages when they don't feel >>qualified to. After all, I am a DD, I have the technical power to make >>changes to eglibc and upload it, but I should probably not do that. Why >>am I treated differently from DCs in that regard? >> >>My own preference is [B] > [A] > [original GR proposal]. But I'd like to >>hear some other opinions before working on a draft amendment for either >>[A] or [B]. > > Same here. I'd also be interested in an amandment for [B] at least. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad?
Description: PGP signature