Re: Q for all candidates: license and copyright requirements
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:00:38PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 23. März 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > The second option aims at clarifying what is the source of the Debian
> > > operating system. It is controversial.
> > It is a lot but not controversial, actually its pretty clear.
> > For that statement alone *I* hope NOTA will have a big win over you,
> > sorry. It shows you are way off with actual project.
> I've been thinking about this statement last night and this morning and noon,
> and came to the conclusion that I have to fullheartly agree with what Joerg
> Charles, I think your ideas how Debian should change because it's "oh so much
> work for no gain to do the right thing" are almost insulting to the core
> values of the project. Good thing that values cannot be insulted ;-)
At the risk of repeating myself (I already said it in an answer to
Charles' GR proposal), these core values are also what all DDs agreed to
abide by. If Charles doesn't like Debian's core values, maybe he should