Hi Charles, On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:03:00AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > The second option aims at clarifying what is the source of the Debian > operating system. It is controversial. I would like to say, for the record, that I believe you've lost track of what lives in Debian if you claim this. I agree with you that having to repack software for Debian is annoying, and that it may be a waste of time. I've had to do it myself, for beid, and it's not the most fun part of my involvement in Debian. However, I do think you're completely and utterly wrong in your above claim. Over the years, I've talked to many a Debian Developer, at FOSDEM, Debconf, or other gatherings, and never did I meet anyone who would even talk about this. If it indeed was "controversial," as you claim, one would think that this would have happened a few times? -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature