Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:12:17AM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
>> Fun! Maybe we should just dispense with the voting and just let the
>> highest number of seconds win?
> That sounds like a good idea. Since it is a supermajority vote, I
> recommend to the proposer to drop the GR if he does not manage to get
> three times the numbers of seconds compared to the status quo amendment,
> that I hereby second.
OTOH, getting loads (say 30) seconds for _this_ option could be construed
as an argument *for* the change proposed by Joerg, which would be rather