[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question to Stefano, Steve and Luk about the organisation into packaging teams.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:31:34AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>> existing maintainers to join it. In the end I don't have a problem
>> if this team is somewhat bigger. What I think is valueable about such a
>> team is the effects that come from beeing part of a team and beeing
>> responsible. 
>Given the workload on many core packages, I think it's not really
>reasonable to expect to have a big team responsible of many packages.
>I rather like the fact that we have smaller teams each dedicated to
>very few core packages. People can move from teams to teams and be part of
>multiple teams if needed.
>You can't have quality if you don't have 2-3 volunteers feeling personaly
>responsible for a given package.

Absolutely. Beyond a certain size, a team is much more likely to fall
back to "somebody else will do it".

Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
  Mature Sporty Personal
  More Innovation More Adult
  A Man in Dandism
  Powered Midship Specialty

Reply to: