[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions



On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
> In article <87vdq3gcf6.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> > ========================================================================
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> > to initiate one are too small.
> 
> > Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> >    a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
> >    as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
> >    period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
> >    developers to sponsor the resolution.
> > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
> 
> > (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> > ========================================================================
> > PROPOSAL END
> [...]
> 
> seconded.

This time it was good.


Kurt


Reply to: