[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

[second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
In article <[🔎] 87vdq3gcf6.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> ========================================================================
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to initiate one are too small.

> Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
>    a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
>    as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
>    period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
>    developers to sponsor the resolution.
> c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]

> (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> ========================================================================


cu andreas
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: