On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:22:44PM +0000, Ben Finney wrote: >> Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes: >> >> > Though there seem to be a number of people vocally wishing Robert >> > would go away or the like, I have yet to see any substantive >> > response to the questions he's raised in this thread. > >Number of people would like him to reconsider asking the questions just >after a release, rather than just before. > >> My apologies: the current acting Secretary has, indeed, been engaging >> substantively with the questions Robert has raised. However, as that >> discussion continues, the questions don't seem much closer to >> resolution. > >If you can't understand the "Please postpone the bikeshedding after the >lenny release so that you'll have proper answers"-bit then I can nothing >for you. Absolutely. If things go much further we'll end up with enough seconds to force a vote to "hand Robert Millan a nice cup of STFU". I'm hoping that's not what anybody actually wants, but I can also understand why some people might be feeling that way. Robert, I appreciate that you believe you're doing the right thing here, but attempting to continue this discussion right now, just after the first vote that has already delayed Lenny, is not going to help you or anybody. It *is* clear that a substantial majority of DDs want us to release Lenny soon rather than attempt to fix every last issue. Please drop it for now. -- Steve McIntyre, Debian Project Leader <leader@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature