Re: [vote_002] Preparation of the ballot.
On 27/11/08 at 10:19 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The discussion period ended, and as there was actually no discussion taking
> place, I think it would be appropriate to call for the vote soon.
> The ballot could list the proposal and its two amendments as on the web page,
> and offer the following choices:
> [ ] Choice 1: Invite the DAM and all the contributors to further develop their ideas.
This one is really tricky to summarize properly.
what about s/develop/discuss/? 'develop' is a bit ambiguous here.
> [ ] Choice 2: Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes.
Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote/consensus. ?
> [ ] Choice 3: Ask the DAMs to implement the changes.
> [ ] Choice 4: Further discussion.
> I welcome any feedback, but would in particular like to read from Peter and
> Lucas before calling for a vote. Also, I do not know how the choices should be
> ordered (randomised?) and of course leave the decision to Neil.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| email@example.com http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |