Re: Vote pages up
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20081123195401.GB29889@xanadu.blop.info>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 08:54:01PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/11/08 at 11:29 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Pages of the two issues currently under discussion are now
> > available (I'll note that none of the proposers ever turned in any wml
> > for their proposals, so this was done by the Secretary and asst
> > secretary). These pages, because of an undiagnosed bug, do not turn up
> > on the navigation bar on the left.
> > http://www.debian.org/vote/2008/vote_002
> > http://www.debian.org/vote/2008/vote_003
> For vote 002, why did you decide to list the two additional options I
> proposed as amendements, rather than proposals (like you did in vote
> 003)? The alternate proposals don't intend to amend the initial
> proposal, but to replace it, so it seems misleading to list them as
As I read it, amendments are proposed and sponsored. In this case the
amendment is to "replace the entire text of the resolution with the
following...". I don't see how it's misleading to call it an amendment.
As for vote_003, I didn't write that one, but it may have something to
do with different resolutions being one ballot, at a guess.
02:14:04 <stockholm> crap. my squirrelmail does not work
02:14:07 <stockholm> Maulkin: ping
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----