Re: call for seconds: on firmware
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> writes:
> The release team is free to interpret the SC and decide there is
> no violation there (as long as they have a rationale, defensible
> position, etc). That would not violate the constitution.
My understanding is that that's exactly what they did, and that's what my
post was trying to say. That would make FD mean N-N-R-N-N, yes?
(This is probably confused by the fact that the release team has several
members who seem to have reached the same conclusion for different
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>