[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: call for seconds: on firmware



On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:45:56 -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:

>         Since some people have had trouble reading the proposals, I am
>  including a short impact of the proposal list below the proposal. 

Thanks for listing the consequences of the different choices.

In order to make it easier for me and maybe others I'm trying to
compact them into a single table below (the FD column is from Russ'
followup mail to -vote).
 
v Consequence / Proposal >                     | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | FD
-----------------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
  i require source for firmware in main        | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | Y
 ii allow Rel.Team to ignore SC violation bugs | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N
iii What do we do for Lenny                    | W | R | R | R | R | R | W
 iv modify foundation documents                | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | N
  v override foundation documents              | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | N
-----------------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
                                                Y(es) N(o) R(elease) W(ait)

As a side note:
I guess what makes this vote confusing (at least for me) is that we
try to answer several questions (roughly equivalent to the
consuequences) in one vote ...

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Andrew Lloyd Webber & Tim Rice

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: