[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

Le samedi 15 novembre 2008 à 09:45 -0600, Debian Project Secretary a
écrit :
> | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1
> | majority)

So you get to decide which options need 3:1 majority?

I don’t understand why you decide that we need a 3:1 majority to allow
release managers to release lenny, while we do not require such a fuss
to allow kernel or glibc developers to knowingly violate the social
contract at each upload.

Why should we consider the stable release process differently from our
other processes?

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: