Re: For our own good: splitting the vote. Thoughts?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:56:06AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:23:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On the contrary. It is excess of overlapping options that prompt for strategic
> > voting. For example, if I don't care much between option A and option B, but
> > prefer either of them to option C
> So, your opinion would be
No, that would be my strategical vote. My opinion could be e.g. 123.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."