Re: Call for seconds: post-Lenny enforceability of DFSG violations
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:27:24AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Is this intended to bypass the NEW process currently done by ftpmasters
> any time something is added to non-free? I suspect the ftpmasters will
> not be enthusiastic about complying with a GR that requires a mechanism
> to bypass the NEW queue. Not to say we can't pass the GR, but I would
> much rather see something that does not step on those toes.
ACK about your concerns (and the ones pointed by others, which are roughly
the same). Do you have any suggestion on what would be a better approach?
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."