>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192 >> > [ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided >> > [ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided >> > [ ] Choice 3: Further discussion >> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> This ballot is wrong. >> It is *not* a membership reform. > Suggested wording then? None at all, drop the immediate vote. As I already explained none of this is implemented yet. None of this will be implemented within the next few weeks. So, for the sanity (if any is left), could the proposer and all its sponsors, agree to not have an immediate vote on this, as it *WONT* do anything except creating needless work? It's more than enough to have the normal vote procedure run. Of course the secretary has to accept this, as its not written down in constitution, but as this immediate vote is a NOOP, no matter what the outcome is, it would only save them work to accept it. -- bye, Joerg 00:00:11 <LupusE> goebelmeier: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html <- warum steht hier 'mplayer'? ist das eine whishlist?
Description: PGP signature