[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft ballot for Proceedural Vote: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.



>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192
>> > [   ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided
>> > [   ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided
>> > [   ] Choice 3: Further discussion
>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> This ballot is wrong.
>> It is *not* a membership reform.
> Suggested wording then?

None at all, drop the immediate vote.

As I already explained none of this is implemented yet. None of this
will be implemented within the next few weeks.

So, for the sanity (if any is left), could the proposer and all its
sponsors, agree to not have an immediate vote on this, as it
*WONT* do anything except creating needless work? It's more than enough
to have the normal vote procedure run.

Of course the secretary has to accept this, as its not written down in
constitution, but as this immediate vote is a NOOP, no matter what the
outcome is, it would only save them work to accept it.

-- 
bye, Joerg
00:00:11 <LupusE> goebelmeier: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html <-
warum steht hier 'mplayer'? ist das eine whishlist?

Attachment: pgp5GOs9qtcx9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: