Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:29:01PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:40:14PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:02:36PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > No firmware
> > > issue tagged etch-ignore is still present in lenny. IOW the kernel team
> > > *is* doing good work in that area, and I see no reason to pressure them
> > > more than useful.
> >
> > This ain't true. Some of these bugs were known since 2006, and even 2004.
> > See my report in #497823 (second mail).
>
> I read that as a leftover from #242866, where most of it has been
> cleansed. FInger pointing on one or two bugs among dozens is laughable.
> "Some of these bugs" were known, true, but that's the fucking point.
The point of my reply is that your statement ("No firmware issue ...") was not
true, so I simply intended to clarify that. I understand you may not like
being corrected, but there's no need to overreact.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Reply to: