[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations



On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:45:33PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:27:14PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > 
> > BTW, as you seems really concerned by this kind of bug and think it is
> > easy, I offer you to do the job of getting this code relicensed. If in
> > 60 days (the same delay as you proposed) it is not done, I will consider
> > that this bug can be ignored for Lenny.
> 
> I think you were going to do that anyway.
> 
> If I may make a suggestion, I think a simple solution would be to split the
> library in a separate package, and move that to non-free.  I might even have
> time to help after I finish with this discussion, the dsp56 free firmware,
> etc.

If you deal with the libc.so.6 -> libc.so.7 transition and that you
explain to all Debian users why *NO* binary thing (oracle, flash, ...)
will ever work on their Debian system, then yeah, go for it.

Is it me, or you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about ?
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpEKf93LXISi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: