[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question for the candidates: not being DPL.



On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:47:26AM +0000, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> Hello all, 
> 
> Once again, if you have covered this in your platform, just say so.
> There are two questions, but one is the inverse of the other... 
> 
> There are 9 people standing, with a wide range of ideas in their
> platforms. If you fail to be elected, will you still work on things
> from your platform? Which bits and why?

That will depend on the outcome of the elections Some of the candidates
have written platforms that are in some respects similar to mine,
although most either have different priorities, or have different ideas
about what should be done to remedy the issues. If one of these other
candidates gets elected over me by a sufficiently large margin, then I
guess it's clear that the ideas I have about what should be done either
are not based on reality, or that the consensus of the project is that
they would not work.

In such a case, it would not make a whole lot of sense to try and do
what I wanted to do anyway. However, if the DPL-elect were to ask me to
help on what I think is most important, then I do not foresee refusing
that request.

> You may prefer to answer this: What part of your platform cannot be
> done without the DPL working on it and why?

I don't think there's much in my platform that _can_ be done without the
DPL working on it.

-- 
Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: