Re: Ideas about a GR to fix the DAM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 20-11-2007 20:58, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
> The point of this thread, according to the original mail was:
>
> "My Idea would be to give Joerg Jaspert full access to the LDAP and
> to the keyring, exactly as James Troup has now. [...] Additionally
> I think there should be 2 more people added to the DAM which will be
> able to DAM approve the applicants."
>
> The infrastructure for maintaining the keyring does not support multiple
> maintainers, so the only option we currently have is to replace the
> maintainer not add co-maintainers. And we already have multiple people
> with access to change LDAP -- that isn't the problem.
>
> As I've said earlier -- last I heard, which was when I was talking to
> James and Joerg as DPL at the start of this year -- there weren't any
> candidates for additional DAMs. So far, I haven't seen any indication
> that's changed.
[...]
Anthony,
Considering that this is probably a "language misunderstanding"
from a non-native speaker (myself), when you say "there weren't any
candidates for additional DAMs" that means (from what you heard, of
course):
a) DAMs don't think there is somebody ready/prepared to join DAM team
b) Nobody volunteered (or showed interested) in join DAM team
c) People volunteered but they are not ready/prepared to join DAM team
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHRO+NCjAO0JDlykYRAm8gAJ9ByTq2IVKQFI66wgaAl5SeDRhFfQCeJKSo
2PaRVXzgnkks5v4hZohJ30U=
=0xql
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: