Re: The Debian Maintainers GR
On 11095 March 1977, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:17:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Why not, he didn't ask for any reaction from FD, NM or DAM before proposing,
>> so I very much blame him for not having a good proposal in the vote...
> Okay, I've been avoiding this issue, but the above's an outright lie,
> and since DAM and FD seem to be encouraging that misapprehension,
> I guess I can't avoid addressing it anymore.
> As people are presumably aware, I first proposed this back in April
> last year on my blog. This was then taken up by Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
> (one of the front desk members) as part of his "Reforming the NM Process"
> proposal:
Oh my, you must really fear losing this vote, eh? Or why do you resort
to make private email public, without even asking all those involved
people? Thats below every level I would have ever expected from you. :()
EO(Sub)T for me.
--
bye Joerg
[ New Maintainer Prozess ]
<panthera> ein jahr ist ein bisschen zu optimistisch,
<_rene_> panthera: kommt auf den NM/AM an.
/* _rene_ ist pantheras AM und lässt sich mit pantheras
package check schon ein wenig Zeit ;) */
Reply to: