[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal, alternative update

Hi aj

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:56:50 pm Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:05:57PM +0200, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > I'd like to offer an alternative gr proposal. I read the whole thread
> > (took me most of the night :( ) and after some discussions on IRC, I come
> > up with this proposal.

> Just a quick note -- the updated DM proposal's finished it's minimum
> discussion at this point by my count, so if there's some way of
> reconciling some of the alternative ideas to get an actual proposal, it
> might be good to get that done so it can be an alternative on the ballot.
Thanks for the note. But I do not really see how to implement my proposal into 
yours either :(
We both agree on a different class called the DM and their rights are the 
same. The difference is that I connected it with the NM process and this 
connection is compulsory, while in yours it isn't necessarily.
Of course, feel free to add all the proposals to the ballot, but there is no 
need for you to do that, because you got most of the seconds :) (though it 
would be nice to see what the project as a whole wants).
Maybe you have any other suggestions, but I do not see how to merge ours in 
the main point (NM process) and I already see the rest as merged.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: