[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal, updated

On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
> > would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only
> > then issue a GR outlining how the practicalities will be handled (if
> > needed). There is also an alternative to just creating a new class that
> > is more general and, in my opinion, has other benefits:
> We definitely need to revamp the constitution, but it's certainly not a
> pre-requesite to this proposal.

  Eeeww that's a very quick assertion. I don't grok the cause and effect
relation here.

> On the contrary, I'd more happily revamp the constitution once we gained
> some confidence that going in this direction was the right thing to do.

  Revamp in which direction ? Adding castes ? Now _that_ would be an
improvement… or maybe not.

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpOZFq1bxSS0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: