On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes > > would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only > > then issue a GR outlining how the practicalities will be handled (if > > needed). There is also an alternative to just creating a new class that > > is more general and, in my opinion, has other benefits: > > We definitely need to revamp the constitution, but it's certainly not a > pre-requesite to this proposal. Eeeww that's a very quick assertion. I don't grok the cause and effect relation here. > On the contrary, I'd more happily revamp the constitution once we gained > some confidence that going in this direction was the right thing to do. Revamp in which direction ? Adding castes ? Now _that_ would be an improvement… or maybe not. Frightened, -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpOZFq1bxSS0.pgp
Description: PGP signature